<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Jersey, always at the fore of great ideas!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blackmaps.wordpress.com/2009/04/02/new-jersey-always-at-the-fore-of-great-ideas/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blackmaps.wordpress.com/2009/04/02/new-jersey-always-at-the-fore-of-great-ideas/</link>
	<description>reflections of an amateur cartographer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 19:04:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russell</title>
		<link>http://blackmaps.wordpress.com/2009/04/02/new-jersey-always-at-the-fore-of-great-ideas/#comment-345</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Russell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 18:28:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blackmaps.wordpress.com/?p=361#comment-345</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s still borderline science fiction, but my favorite solution is to dig deep sub-sediment tunnels beneath the ocean floor in subduction zones, like off the coast of California.  The material is sequestered away from plant and animal life, is kept cool, and is eventually sucked back into the mantle for nice, natural reprocessing (in millions of years.)  It also reduces the risk of people accidentally or purposely recovering the material, because there are few nations capable of deep ocean recovery, and those that can don&#039;t care about spent material.

Since it will be very difficult to convince other environmentalists that this plan could be done without harming ocean ecosystems, I suspect that Yucca Mountain is the most likely candidate for an actual &quot;long-term&quot; solution.  It&#039;s better than the current distributed system where the material is just sitting in tanks.

The recent EPA guidelines allowing control of CO2 are going to be a boon for the nuclear industry, making coal plants more expensive to run, and thereby making nuclear (and other green power) more affordable by comparison.  Perhaps we&#039;ll be able to make reprocessing part of the cost of running a plant, and that will reduce waste material.  It will also make it more attractive for the folks operating this NJ plant to tear it down and build a newer, safer design (pebble bed?).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s still borderline science fiction, but my favorite solution is to dig deep sub-sediment tunnels beneath the ocean floor in subduction zones, like off the coast of California.  The material is sequestered away from plant and animal life, is kept cool, and is eventually sucked back into the mantle for nice, natural reprocessing (in millions of years.)  It also reduces the risk of people accidentally or purposely recovering the material, because there are few nations capable of deep ocean recovery, and those that can don&#8217;t care about spent material.</p>
<p>Since it will be very difficult to convince other environmentalists that this plan could be done without harming ocean ecosystems, I suspect that Yucca Mountain is the most likely candidate for an actual &#8220;long-term&#8221; solution.  It&#8217;s better than the current distributed system where the material is just sitting in tanks.</p>
<p>The recent EPA guidelines allowing control of CO2 are going to be a boon for the nuclear industry, making coal plants more expensive to run, and thereby making nuclear (and other green power) more affordable by comparison.  Perhaps we&#8217;ll be able to make reprocessing part of the cost of running a plant, and that will reduce waste material.  It will also make it more attractive for the folks operating this NJ plant to tear it down and build a newer, safer design (pebble bed?).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: swamptroll</title>
		<link>http://blackmaps.wordpress.com/2009/04/02/new-jersey-always-at-the-fore-of-great-ideas/#comment-344</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[swamptroll]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 15:59:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blackmaps.wordpress.com/?p=361#comment-344</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m on the fence about nuclear.

So Russell - what do you do with the spent nuclear fuel rods and similar materials?  And please don&#039;t just say &quot;bury them on the reservations or launch them into space.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m on the fence about nuclear.</p>
<p>So Russell &#8211; what do you do with the spent nuclear fuel rods and similar materials?  And please don&#8217;t just say &#8220;bury them on the reservations or launch them into space.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russell</title>
		<link>http://blackmaps.wordpress.com/2009/04/02/new-jersey-always-at-the-fore-of-great-ideas/#comment-156</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Russell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 21:41:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blackmaps.wordpress.com/?p=361#comment-156</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m a pro-nuclear environmentalist: better to maybe, with effort, if you shut off all of the redundant safety controls, ruin a few square miles than continually dump CO2 from coal plants into the atmosphere.  Yes, renew their license if they meet standards and build more!  And no, it&#039;s not because this plant is in New Jersey while I&#039;m in California - re-open Rancho Seco in Sacramento, too!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a pro-nuclear environmentalist: better to maybe, with effort, if you shut off all of the redundant safety controls, ruin a few square miles than continually dump CO2 from coal plants into the atmosphere.  Yes, renew their license if they meet standards and build more!  And no, it&#8217;s not because this plant is in New Jersey while I&#8217;m in California &#8211; re-open Rancho Seco in Sacramento, too!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
